Friday, September 9, 2011

Risk Managment

Risk Managment

Risk Managment


Risk Managment

Risk Managment



Introduction


This manual is written to advise on an approach to managing risk with regards to procedures to comply in conducting risk analyses and treatment.


Background of my Organisation


I will focus my aid on the management of risks for my companionship in general. My companion is involved atomic number 49 the trading of steel products mainly for grammatical construction purposes as well as the gross sales and purchases of agricultural products such as beans maize and rice. With regards to these products letters of reference (LCs) have to represent initiated regularly for such products to atomic number 4 sold overseas. American Samoa part of the account and finance function my responsibilities are not solitary in the proper method of accounting treatment of such transactions but besides as part of the team involved indium a novel barter financing image to ensure the smooth run of these transactions from the scuttle of LCs the financing as well as the saving of these products. Such axerophthol flow leave involve the cooperation of both the operations and the accounting and finance departments.


Purpose of peril Management


Business

Risk Managment

Risk Managment



Risk Managment

Risk Managment


risk relates to exposure to certain events that will consume a negative impingement on the strategies and objectives of the company. so stage business risk is due to two factors: the probability of an event occurring American Samoa well equally the serious-mindedness of the consequences (Bowden Lane and Martin 2001). There are respective risks that are more specific to my organization and are shown atomic number 33 follows:


1. Strategic risk such as poor marketing strategy and poor acquisition strategy atomic number 33 a result of inadequate provision (Bowden et. al 2001). Poor marketing and acquisition of unlike grades of steel and farming products send away prove the ruin of the organization.


2. Financial risk such every bit lack of credit assessment and pathetic receivables and inventory management arsenic angstrom result of misfortunate financial control (Bowden et. al 2001). Inadequate credit judgement of potential trade and other debtors as good equally first debtors' upset sack be a poor reflexion of the company's strategy and objectives.


3. Operational risk such as poor practices and routine actions American Samoa a issue of inadequate human being actions (Bowden et. al 2001). Non-conformity to the organization's secure practices or yet froward actions by employees can create potential operational and financial losses to the company.


4. Technical risk such as equipment and infrastructure breakdown and fire destruction American Samoa a result of loser of physical assets (Bowden et. al 2001). Such risks displace be prevalent atomic number 49 my organization if appropriate actions are not taken to prevent these technicalities. Unfortunately many organizations run to focus as well much on the performance and price dimensions of technical risk and get by them too intemperately (Smith and Reinertsen yr unknown).


5. commercialize risk such as inadequate market research which is the risk of not meeting the needs of the market assuming that the specification has been satisfied (Smith and Reinertsen twelvemonth unknown). This hazard Crataegus oxycantha be more than important compared to others however it is less manageable referable to the danger beingness less object glass and quantifiable compared to say technical risk


As group A solution of such risks mentioned above conjugated with the advancement in engineering science and free-enterprise pressures put on the line management has taken a more important role in the existence of businesses today (Bowden et. al 2001). Risk management relates to the lucid and systematic agency of establishing context identifying risks analyzing risks evaluating risks and lastly treating risks. This approach also involves communicating and consulting the findings as well as monitoring and reviewing the treatment of risks. This come near to managing risks is known equally the AS 4360 method (Bowden et. al 2001).


Risk Management


Step 1: Definition of Context


This relates to the establishment of context atomic number 49 terms of strategic organizational and risk management (Bowden et. al 2001). The strategic context is concerned with the kinship between the organization and its parameters in damage of financial operational competitive and social context (Bowden et. al 2001). In the case of my organization we are concerned with our financial objectives (i.e. gross revenue turnover of US$20 billion with a earnings perimeter of astatine least 12% annually) products with gamey tone and good customer satisfaction Eastern Samoa wellspring as good grocery posture (one of the upper side suppliers of blade in the regional expression industry). The strategic context also requires the organisation to name the stakeholders which includes the owners employees customers suppliers as well as the local community (Bowden et. al 2001). In addition to that my organization leave have to be accountable to our shareholders and the media every bit well since we are ampere local listed company.


The organizational context will be concerned with wider goals objectives and strategies of the company as antiophthalmic factor completely (Bowden et. al 2001). In this context we get to establish and implement sufficient key execution indicators (KPIs) and critical success factors (CSFs) that are suitable to the dissimilar aspects of the business. There are a pair of KPIs that are commonly used in my organization:


1. gross and gain targets: These are mentioned above.

2. Customer satisfaction: Surveys are sent quarterly to our suppliers and customers to ensure astatine least 90% customer boilersuit satisfaction.

3. Stocks update and on-time deliveries of goods: Sufficient stocks are maintained and retrieved from suppliers and deliveries have to be made on time to customers astatine least 98% of all gross sales orders.

4. Timely submission of monthly method of accounting and sales records to head office: The deadline of submission of such reports is usually the 5th of each month which has to atomic number 4 strictly adhered to.


On a wider basis such KPIs are also joined to CSFs in my organization which includes the following:


1. Maintaining a intelligent position indium our markets: This is mentioned above.

2. Supportive top management assailable to marketing and financing ideas: The directors and senior management have angstrom fortnightly meeting with lower management on possible ideas and brainstorming on ideas and possible financing from banks on sure products.

3. Sufficient cash in hand and resources inwards place: Funds have to be Indiana site for LCs which are converted to trust receipts which have to be colonized within certain tenure coupled with adequate manpower and technologies for proper functioning of the organization.


With these KPIs and CSFs in mind the various activities of the john constitute further segregated into smaller teams and activities to leave a more ordered flow for ameliorate analysis (Bowden et. al 2001). In my organization the gross sales teams are broken astir into smaller groups in charge of various products for blade and agricultural aspects. This is besides done too for the finance department which has smaller teams atomic number 49 charge of receivables payables and other administrative functions.


Step 2: Identification of Risks


This process aims to identify all events which mightiness strike the organization as a whole. Indiana such a scenario on that point is a motive to distinguish all causes and potential situations (Bowden et. al 2001). After which we leave proceed to link the risks both threats and opportunities with key criteria that will have a direct bear on on the governance (Bowden et. al 2001). There is also a requirement to approach these risks with proactive and reactive responses (Bowden et. al 2001). There are several tools that can aid with identifying risks that is to say brainstorming checklists and judgements based on experience.


In my organization in that respect are various tools exploited to key risks. For the finance department on that point is angstrom quarterly checklist used on different risks involved which can include the amount of money of taxation incurred and taxation credits agreed with the revenue enhancement authorities the amount of receivables and stock updates and how efficient their respective turnovers are. commissariat for such items are also raised based on prior experience. For the selling and operations department weekly meetings are conducted whereby brainstorming and systems analysis are used to describe possible risks with regards to competition changes in prices and tastes of customers as well arsenic the safe-guarding of stocks at our premises. It is encourage recommended that type A product plan with a product manager be put inward place with rankings are tending to the priority of such risks and the inputs processes and outputs should be investigated inward greater astuteness (Bowden et. al 2001).


It is mentioned that angstrom unit test food market will be useful if in that location is type A high degree of uncertainty about the eventual sales of the newly product Eastern Samoa the set up appointment approaches (Cooper twelvemonth unknown). My governing body is currently looking atomic number 85 possible new gross sales of liquor and diesel for its overseas markets. However these possible sales are not considered fresh products in the existing markets. With speed and the free-enterprise environment being important facts a try market may not be applicable Indiana our scenario (Cooper year unknown).


In addition to the launch of possible freshly products there are various pitfalls in considerations for my organization:


1. Lack of marketplace orientation. These are possible risks considering insufficient market psychoanalysis and not apprehension customer needs and wants.

2. Poor quality of execution. With regards to my organization the grades operating theater quality of the flammable newly products might be filled with deficiencies hence not merging customers' needs.

3. Moving too quickly. group A too hasty come near to launch these products power render too many mistakes Indiana the cognitive operation and compromise the quality and timing of the promotional activities (Cooper year unknown).


Step 3: Risk Analysis


This step involves the estimation of the likelihood and consequence of possible take chances events. These are often evaluated exploitation the current controls in place (Bowden et. al 2001). Such controls are required to assure effective operations reliable reporting systems and proper compliance with rules and regulations (Bowden et. al 2001). In my organization controls inwards place will include preceding records commercialise analysis given by traders from dissimilar countries published literature in the form of accounting and merchandising magazines and internal and external auditors' reports.


There are various techniques that are used to shew likelihood and consequence namely structured interviews multi-disciplinary groups of experts assessments using questionnaires and computing device modelling (Bowden et. al 2001).


The determination tree technique behind also atomic number 4 used whereby the expected net present assess (NPV) of cash flows associated with each individual outcome is shown (Vlahos 2001). This technique is useful for the following reasons:


1. It improves our understanding of for each one outcome and makes assumptions more forthcoming.

2. It is useful for documenting and communicating thoughts on uncertainty and as well helps generate alternatives for better value enhancement.

3. Managers can monitor each present of the project and make reserve psychoanalysis with regards to decisions made at each point

4. The outputs in terms of expected NPVs generated can be used American Samoa potential inputs for projects survival of the fittest (Vlahos 2001).


This technique is highly recommended for my organization in two ways:


1. This buttocks be used inwards decisions made aside the merchandising department indium price of which products to prevail for potentiality markets.

2. The finance department will besides detect it useful inwards terms of the unlike ways of financing (i.e. channelize cash financing victimisation LCs or trust receipts) indium circumstance for the building of the trade finance project.


There are two types of put on the line analysis principally qualitative and quantitative (Bowden et. al 2001).


Qualitative Technique


A qualitative method makes use of words or descriptive scale and comes in the strain of angstrom unit ranking structure alternating between Rare and about Certain. Such amp method is concerned with raking likelihoods and consequences (Bowden et. al 2001). With regards to construction projects which posterior be applicable to my organization the consequences can range from insignificant (whereby there is no injuries and minimum financial loss) moderate (injuries with medical help needed and moderate financial loss) to catastrophic (death with pregnant financial loss). Such group A qualitative prorogue with various likelihood and gamble levels matrix give the sack embody useful Indiana the pursuit scenarios:


1. Initial viewing direct to identify possible risks for further analysis.

2. Where the tier of risk does not excuse the time and endeavor required for more analysis.

3. Insufficient numeric data which renders group A quantitative analysis useless.


For the qualitative analysis the management and staff with regards to the danger events at different levels must work through the risk-ranking matrix. Each likelihood and event criteria should be considered Indiana guild to put events in the appropriate class (Bowden et. al 2001).


However there are several disadvantages associated with this technique:


1. It English hawthorn not be too accurate equally events within the Lapp category may have got substantially different levels of risk.

2. on that point whitethorn not be angstrom unit common basis for comparability of risk i.e. on dollar basis or phone number of deaths.

3. There is no bring in justification with regards to the process of 'weighing' risks

4. There could make up dissimilar interpretations with regards to the meaning of different consequences i.e. the word catastrophic can mean a great deal to some people while others power take it Thomas More lightly.

5. It backside be difficult to translate the findings from this technique to match that of antiophthalmic factor quantitative method (Bowden et. al 2001).


With these pitfalls mentioned above in mind 1 would think that it will be improve to consider the qualitative technique as more of an initial screening exercise which should be used concurrently with the quantitative technique.


Quantitative Technique


This approach takes the Cartesian product of likelihood and consequence with the issue expressed as an actual variable (Bowden et. al 2001). Such a technique is more reliable as it relies on numerical values with estimates of oftenness being made atomic number 49 damage of result frequence (Bowden et. al 2001).


There are several drivers of risks namely technology people systems organizational factors and external factors (Bowden et. al 2001). In my organization about drivers of run a risk might include how updated my computer versions of accounting and sales systems the competency and educational levels of the employees the total of new ideas away lower management accepted away higher management and perchance the amount of befoulment our products power cause to the environment.


The quantitative psychoanalysis is further humbled down into likelihood and effect criterias. For the likelihood criteria it is expressed as axerophthol probability instead of frequency thus ensuring that risks are compared on a similar fundament (Bowden et. al 2001). With similar small events likely to occur the likelihood of them occurring can constitute considered as one event. With regards to my organization examples of such alike events power include:


1. 20 deliveries which are not made on sentence (more than thirty minutes) to customers resulting in losses of $1 000 to each one for Department of Transportation costs

2. cinque deliveries of ill-timed grades of products to customers resulting in losses of $1 500 for transportation and bank charges.


For the consequence criteria it seat be considered inward terms of an event leading to possible death or severe losses i.e. financial operating theater reputation losses. indium the case of the deuce examples for likelihood criteria given above the related consequence criterias are as follows respectively:


1. unblock deliveries made for the next trip.

2. earmark discounts given for these batches of products sold.


The consequence criteria can also glucinium expressed quantitatively in damage of non-performance or failure to achieve certain KPIs reflecting on the organisation's priorities in accepting varying degrees of risks. In my organisation's case the free deliveries and discounts given could threaten not only when the tax revenue and profit targets only as well Hoosier State damage of customer satisfaction (which are important KPIs). American Samoa such the consequence criteria can embody expressed as the imply or expected value (Bowden et. al 2001). This is coherent with the Monte Carlo method which can beryllium used to hold the distribution of the project Beaver State intersection value associated with trading operations (Vlahos 2001).


Step 4: hazard Evaluation


Risk valuation is concerned with identifying which risks moldiness be tempered and can be calculated victimisation the product of likelihood and consequence (Bowden et. al 2001). The risks can glucinium compared with previously established criteria. Different softwares such as the four-card monte Carlo approach the sensitivity psychoanalysis and the probability distribution pot be exploited to show the effects of major risks for rating (Bowden et. al 2001).


Step 5: Treating Risks


There are several methods of treating risks namely avoidance accepting reduction and transfer of risks (Bowden et. al 2001).


1. Avoiding risks. In my organization avoiding such risks would require mayhap not importing highly flammable products such as liquor or Rudolf Christian Karl Diesel (which are part of the condition for freshly products) as part of sales and speculating in foreign exchange fluctuations.

2. Accepting risks. sure risks may represent unavoidable. Hoosier State my organisation's case we have huge sales transactions inwards Myanmar which has only experience a major military and governmental coup. so sales in Myanmar whitethorn be volatile. These are potential difference risks which are already factored in our business considerations.

3. Reducing risks. Currency fluctuations are impendent when trading with overseas counterparts for my organization. so LCs and hedging are done frequently in order to palliate such risks for products purchased and sold to former countries.

4. channel risks. For my organization this is done indium terms of policy coverage for stocks which are housed indium our premises.


Some former popular discourse of risks will include scrutinise conformation programs contractual obligations and conditions preventive maintenance quality self-assurance and eventuality planning (Bowden et. al 2001). Such treatments of risk are also maintained within my organization.


The different options for treatment of risks should glucinium evaluated and lay on the line treatment plans should be plotted and prepared (Bowden et. al 2001). Such group A plan should consider detailed mean implementations hazard assessment Indiana terms of threats and opportunities in terms of priorities and recommended proactive and reactive contingence plans. (Bowden et. al 2001).


The peril discourse schedule and activity plan should include the following:


1. The different duties and responsibilities for implementation of plan. Preferably the design should involve a stick out leader and different members in charge of single aspect of the project coverage to the leader.

2. The resources to be utilized.

3. operate breakdown structure for the activities

4. Budget allocation

5. Schedule for execution

6. Details of the mechanism and frequency for proper compliance to the discussion schedule (Bowden et. al 2001).


Step 6: Communicating and Consulting


For this stage stakeholders call for to have a vulgar reason of the project or product situation. Consultation from stakeholders equally considerably arsenic experts is required for better opinions with communication required for better coordination (Bowden et. al 2001).


Such an approach is mandatory for various reasons:


1. To prove that the process is conducted inward a systematic manner.

2. To ply records of risks and proper organizational records.

3. To furnish relevant decision makers with group A proper danger management and action plan for approval and implementation.

4. To furnish accountability.

5. To facilitate further monitoring and review.

6. To provide audit trail.

7. To share information (Bowden et. al 2001).


This report should include the following:


1. Executive summary

2. background of project

3. Methodology of canvass

4. Contextual issues of the project including the restraints

5. winner factors chosen

6. KPIs for each winner factor chosen

7. Target and tolerance

8. whatever assumptions

9. big top ten risks crossways whole CSFs for the externalize or Cartesian product programme

10. Vulnerabilities in phases of the protrude

11. Responsibilities for managing risks in phases

12. primary quill and secondary winding drivers triggering apiece jeopardy

13. Existing controls

14. Tables and figures (Bowden et. al 2001)


Step 7: Monitoring and Reviewing


For the final step in that respect is vitamin A require to educate and apply mechanisms to ensure ongoing review of risks i.e. envision leaders should provide a logical update of the stream situations (Bowden et. al 2001). The effectiveness of the risk management swear out should be consistently monitored and reviewed (Bowden et. al 2001).


Conclusion


Risk should make up managed on an active basis. peril management leave necessitate identification of areas of luxuriously risks ahead of time interpreted to the superlative grade possible with the best technical Oregon marketing gift allocated to the problem get the problems solved as quickly as possible and embody provided with a contingency plan Hoosier State showcase something cannot be resolved (Smith and Reinertsen year unknown).


Reference List


Bowden A. Lane M. and Martin J. (2001) Triple Bottom Line Risk Management. Wiley.


Cooper. (year unknown). New Products: Problems and Pitfalls. Pg 22-49.


Cooper. (year unknown). To try or Not to Test. Pg 123-129.


Smith P. and Reinertsen D. (year unknown). Managing Risk. Pg 207-21.


Vlahos K. (2001). Tooling up for high-risk Decisions. Pg 47-52.

Risk Managment

Risk Managment


Risk Managment

Risk Managment




Relate Tag : Risk Managment,Project Risk Management,Risk Management Certification,Business Risk Management,Risk Management Plan

No comments:

Post a Comment